Home Print this page Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size
Users Online: 257
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 83-91

The responsibility of clinical pharmacists for the safety of medication use in hospitalized children: A Middle Eastern experience


1 Pharmacy Students' Research Committee, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2 Department of Pharmaceutical Care, Imam Hossein Children's Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
3 Department of Pediatric Surgery, Imam Hossein Children's Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
4 Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
5 Health Policy Research Center, Institute of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
6 Department of Pharmaceutical Care, Imam Hossein Children's Hospital; Isfahan Clinical Toxicology Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Date of Web Publication1-Jul-2019

Correspondence Address:
Prof. Ali Mohammad Sabzghabaee
Isfahan Clinical Toxicology Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jrpp.JRPP_19_66

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Objective: We aimed to detect and report the frequency of occurrence of drug-related problems (DRPs) in a Middle Eastern University Children's Hospital (Isfahan, Iran) and classify them in terms of their nature and cause to clarify the responsibility of clinical pharmacists for the safe utilization of medications in hospitalized children. Methods: In this cross-sectional study which was carried out in Imam Hossein Children's University Hospital affiliated with Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (Isfahan, Iran) from September 2017 to May 2018, DRPs during the hospitalization of pediatric patients in three medical wards, the pediatric intensive care unit, and two neonatal intensive care units were detected and identified concurrently with the treatment process using Pharmaceutical Care Network of Europe data gathering form for DRPs v. 8.01. All cases were verified and validated in a professional focus group before documentation. Findings: We detected 427 DRPs in 201 out of 250 randomly included hospitalized children in which 86% of them were directly reported by the hospital's clinical pharmacist. The highest frequency of DRPs (47.3%) was observed in the age range of 1 month–2 years. Safety of treatment was the most frequently reported as the nature of the problem (43.5%), followed by effectiveness issues (36.8%). The most frequent cause of DRPs was dose selection issues (34.2%), followed by drug-type selection (25.5%), and unavailability of appropriate dosage forms (13.6%). Ninety-eight interventions were proposed by the clinical pharmacist, in which 59.2% of them were accepted. Conclusion: This study confirms the necessity for the active role of clinical pharmacists before, during, and after drug therapy in hospitalized pediatric patients for the safety and proper utilization of drugs in this vulnerable population.

Keywords: Adverse drug events, clinical pharmacists, drug-related problems, hospitalized child, medication errors


How to cite this article:
Jafarian K, Allameh Z, Memarzadeh M, Saffaei A, Peymani P, Sabzghabaee AM. The responsibility of clinical pharmacists for the safety of medication use in hospitalized children: A Middle Eastern experience. J Res Pharm Pract 2019;8:83-91

How to cite this URL:
Jafarian K, Allameh Z, Memarzadeh M, Saffaei A, Peymani P, Sabzghabaee AM. The responsibility of clinical pharmacists for the safety of medication use in hospitalized children: A Middle Eastern experience. J Res Pharm Pract [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Sep 15];8:83-91. Available from: http://www.jrpp.net/text.asp?2019/8/2/83/261921




  Introduction Top


Medication errors and their related outcomes are still among the major concerns for health care, providing institutions, insurance bodies, and policymakers of the health sector in the world. According to the report of the seminal institute of medicine, in the United States, drug-related problems (DRPs) cause 44000–98000 cases of death per year mostly due to adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and theoretically preventable medication errors.[1] It is estimated that medication errors or a problem caused by drug utilization during a medical prophylaxis or treatment regimen may lead to the death of 1 individual per 131 outpatients and also one individual per 854 inpatients.[2] DRPs refer to those events or conditions which interfere with the desired health outcome through the legitimate use of medications, rather than the illness itself. These problems are the cause of significant costs and various types of morbidity and mortality[3] for the patients who are seeking recovery of their health using them. ADRs are among the top 10 most prevalent causes of death in the United States[4] which affects annually about 3.4 million people both for the nature of the consequent medical problem and also the need for another remedial action to resolve these undesirable effects of the medications.[5]

Nowadays, different classification systems are introduced to describe and explore DRPs[6] which can help to identify the nature of the problem, its causes, and the needed intervention to prevent the occurrence of further DRPs in hospital settings.[7] The classification which is presented by the Pharmaceutical Care Network of Europe (PCNE) classification[3] is a good and functional example of them.

Establishing pharmaceutical care departments by clinical and hospital pharmacists in hospitals which provides medication safety services as well as drug supply in routine hospital pharmacies is an effective measure to prevent, minimize, and document DRPs and to promote the optimal use of medications.[8] Providing this type of health service with a history of 60 years in some North American medical centers[9] and about 20 years in some university hospitals in Iran has dramatically helped to have a better assessment of DRPs in drug therapy and resulted in the suggestion of practical strategies of pharmacists on these issues.[10],[11] For example, in a recent study conducted by Tasaka et al. in 20 hospitals in Japan, it was shown that 2376 interventions by hospital pharmacists prevented ADRs for 1678 drug orders and effectively decreased the related cost of treatment.[12] Westerlund et al. also reported a study which evaluated the clinical and economic outcomes of pharmacist-led interventions on DRPs. They found that the frequency of ARDs reduced by 32% with 68% of improvement in the efficacy of their drug therapy. In 13% of their cases, the interventions led to the prevention of patients' primary care contact caused by ADRs.[13] Several studies have also reported from Iran on epidemiological characteristics (occurrence, prevalence, or incidence) of DRPs, especially ADRs, which have emphasized on the active role of clinical pharmacists in decreasing these types of problem.[14],[15],[16],[17],[18],[19],[20],[21],[22],[23] However, it should be noted that all of these studies have been conducted by clinical pharmacists themselves and in their employment centers, which may indicate a source of probable bias.

The occurrence of DRPs in the pediatric population has a great source of concern. Comparing to the adult patients, children have a higher risk for developing DRPs (including ADRs) due to the lack of enough safety profile for pediatric use during clinical trial phases of medication, unavailability of different needed pharmaceutical dosages for the drugs with a proper strength and desirable formulation, and most importantly, inadequate and in some cases unpredictable metabolism of drugs in this subgroup of patients.[24],[25],[26]

In this study, we aimed to investigate the frequency of occurrence of DRPs and classify them in terms of their nature and causes in a University Children's Hospital in Isfahan, Iran.


  Methods Top


This cross-sectional study was carried out in Imam Hossein Children's University Hospital affiliated with Isfahan University of Medical Sciences from September 2017 to May 2018. This tertiary care 168-bed medical center, which is fully equipped and facilitated for the pediatric population, is located in Isfahan Province with the mission of health-care promotion for sick children in the central part of Iran. In 2018, the average monthly admission for its medical, surgical wards and intensive care units was about 1700 patients (hospitalized per month) and about 8000 for the outpatient clinics.

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Research Ethics Committee of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences with the registration number of IR.MUI.RESEARCH.REC.1398.040. All patients aged 1 day to <18 years who were admitted at least for 1 day to one of the medical or surgical wards, neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), or pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) were potentially eligible for recruitment to the study. Medical wards of this children's hospital have neurology, nephrology, immunology, asthma and allergic disease medical services (Ped1 ward), gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, and pulmonology medical services (Ped2 ward), and infectious disease medical service (Ped3 ward). The data were collected concurrent with the treatment of pediatric patients by a pharmacy student (KJ) under the supervision of the chief clinical pharmacy specialist of the hospital (ZA) with a direct attendance of an average of 10 h a week and 3 days per week during hospital hours simultaneously with hospitalizations and treatment of patients, and the patients were selected using simple random sampling method. To facilitate the analysis and comparisons, children were categorized in five age groups: neonates (≤1 month), infants (>s1 month to ≤2 years), toddlers and preschool (>2 years to ≤6 years), school-aged (>6 years to ≤12 years), and adolescents (>12 years to ≤18 years) in accordance with part E11 of Guideline of International Conference of Harmonization of pediatric medicine research.[27]

During the study period, the clinical pharmacy specialist of the hospital (ZA) with the companion of a pharmacy student (KJ) had random visits of the admitted patients in casual days in the aforementioned medical and surgical wards and also the intensive care units and the studied patients, and if they found any DRP, they identified and documented it. Patients who had not taken or prescribed any particular medication at the time of admission were not included in the study. For each pediatric patient, the demographic details (e.g., gender, age, and weight) and the admission time diagnosis, received pharmaceutical care, laboratory findings involved in observed problem and the specialty of physician as well as the nature of the suspected problem, and the best guess for the cause of it (based on the patients' medical chart and their medical order forms) were recorded, and the pharmacist's recommendation for resolving it or its prevention for other patients was also documented.

The data collection tool of our study was the modified form for DRP documentation, which is recommended by the PCNE version 8.01. We modified this version by minor changes to make it more practical for the documentation of DRPs, which are potentially concerning in the pediatric population.

In the next step for practical use of the above mentioned adjusted tool, DRPs were detected and described and documented by the pharmacy student under the supervision of an attending clinical pharmacy specialist based in the hospital during medical rounds and were followed up with the review of patients' prescriptions and drug orders. In this regard, we used the latest edition for the online available version of UpTodate®, Lexicomp® and Micromedex® software to check the presence or absence of the indications for medications, their recommended dosage in the pediatric population, medication intervals, dose adjustments for renal and hepatic impairment (where appropriate) and the contraindications of drug usage, and drug interactions and to process other recorded details of the patients.

A professional focus group consisting of a professor of pharmacotherapy (AMS), a pediatric surgeon (MM), a pharmacy student (KJ), and the clinical pharmacy specialist whom the data were recorded under her supervision (ZA) verified and validated the probable nature of the DRP and its possible causes as well as the likely place of origination for it at the time of occurrence (if the problem has occurred before the patient's admission or during his/her hospitalization). In most of the cases, one of the team members (KJ) was attending the medical rounds and discussed the nominated DRP with them to have a better understanding of other possibilities for the nature and causes of DRPs. Alternatively, some few cases of the documented DRPs were reported by other health-care professionals (physicians and nurses) and patients or they companion. These reports were initially reviewed by the pharmacy student and if eligible and reliable (in case of patients self-reports) were then referred to the focus group for validation and classifications.

To harmonize the used medical and pharmaceutical terms, the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification System (ATC) recommended by World Health Organization[28] was used for classifying the drugs and the online version of the International Disease Classification[29] used for classifying the disease diagnosis. Furthermore, generic names of drugs, their ATC code and dosage, and how they were utilized were recorded in the identification process of DRPs.

We used descriptive statistics (numbers, percentages, and means) to report the frequencies of each DRP using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, N.Y., USA).[30]


  Results Top


A total of 250 patients were included in the study in which 201 patients (% 80.4) had at least one DRP with demographic characteristics, as presented in [Table 1]. We identified and documented 427 valid DRPs (averagely, 1.7 DRP per each studied patient), and 89.5% (n = 382) of DRPs occurred after their hospital admission and hospitalization. Three hundred and sixty-seven DRPs (85.9%) of the validated DRPs were observed, identified, and documented by the clinical pharmacist [Figure 1].
Table 1: Demographic data of the study patients in different wards and the frequency of documented drug-related problems

Click here to view
Figure 1: Frequency of drug-related problems documented and reported by different health-care professionals

Click here to view


According to the classification of the studied patients through WHO-ICD10 system, the most common cause of hospitalization of the children in our study was related to respiratory diseases 16.8% (n = 42) [Supplement Table 1 [Additional file 1]] (The Supplemental Tables are available Online in the Journal's Website) while the highest number of DRPs was identified in the PICU with a relative frequency of 21.3% (n = 91). In average, 65% of the total 201 patients with at least one DRP were hospitalized in the nonintensive care units, and the relative frequency of the occurrence of at least one DRP was to some extent higher in noncritically ill patients comparing to the studied patients who were hospitalized in the intensive care units, PICU, and NICUs (84 vs. 75%). Moreover, 58.7% (n = 118) of the studied patients with at least one DRP were male [Table 2].
Table 2: Frequency of drug-related problems in the studied wards

Click here to view


The frequency distribution of identified DRPs in the intensive care units and nonintensive care wards has been presented in [Table 2]. The highest frequency of classified DRP types in our studied patients was related to the safety of treatment with 43.5% (n = 186) and secondarily to the effectiveness of treatment with 36.8% (n = 157).

In this study, the number of prescribed drugs for the hospitalized pediatric patients was between one and five items in 52% of the cases (n = 130) and the rest of them (n = 120); the average number of drug items in each prescription was >5. Ninety percent of patients with a prescriptive drug number >10 had at least one DRP.

The most frequent subgroups of problems' classification were related to the potentially dangerous adverse events with 28.8% (n = 123) and then the nonoptimal effect of drug treatment 22.0% (n = 94) as well as untreated symptoms or indications 13.1% (n = 56). A summary of DRPs frequency in three main and ten subgroups is presented in [Table 3].
Table 3: The most common problem types of drug-related problems classified according to the modified form of the Pharmaceutical Care Network of Europe classification system for drug-related problems version 8.01

Click here to view


According to the ATC classification system for drugs leading to DRPs, the highest frequency of anatomical groups of ATC ( first-order) was related to systemic antimicrobial medicines and nervous system drugs with 30.7% (n = 131), as well as medications related to the gastrointestinal tract and metabolism with 17.8% (n = 76) [Supplement Table 2 [Additional file 2]]. Furthermore, it has been noted in [Supplement Table 3 [Additional file 3]] that the highest frequency of anatomical categories of ATC drugs causing DRP was related to systemic antimicrobial drugs in NICU1 and Ped3 wards (68.2% and 43.53%) and nervous system drugs in units of Ped1, Ped2, and PICU (61.18%, 29.1%, 25.27%). Furthermore, gastrointestinal and metabolism drugs causing DRP had the highest frequency in NICU2 (38.9%).

Causes for drug-related problem occurrence based on Pharmaceutical Care Netwok of Europe form (v. 8.01) classification system

In our study, the most frequent causes of DPR were drug dose selection 34.2% (n = 146), drug selection 25.5% (n = 109), miscellaneous causes 14.5% (n = 62), and finally, problems related to (inappropriate) pharmaceutical dosage forms of the prescribed drugs 13.6% (n = 58). Meanwhile, selecting a drug with a dose higher than the required amount had the highest frequency among drug dose selection reasons causing DPR 12.2% (n = 52). No drug treatment in spite of current indication had the highest frequency among drug selection reasons causing DPR 12.6% (n = 54). A summary of DPR causes, which is classified according to the modified PCNE form (v. 8.01), is presented in [Table 4].
Table 4: The most frequently reported causes of drug-related problems in the studied patients, classified according to the modified form of the Pharmaceutical Care Network of Europe Classification system (v. 8.01)

Click here to view


Considering the scope of the predefined tasks and privileges for the Imam Hossein's clinical pharmacy specialist, 98 interventions were done related to 427 valid identified DRPs (22.9%), in which 54% of them were at the drug prescriptive level (providing consultations to the attending physicians), and 59.2% (n = 58) of the proposed interventions were accepted by medical staff [Supplement Table 4 [Additional file 4]].


  Discussion Top


The incidence of DRP after hospital admission of patients is reported differently in different studies. In a survey conducted by Movva et al., 68.78% of patients with underlying cardiovascular disease admitted to general wards of a hospital were reported with at least one DRP during their hospital stay.[31] According to our findings, 80.4% of our randomly studied patients experienced at least one DRP during their hospital stay, which accentuates the importance of active attendance of clinical pharmacists in medical wards and critical care units, especially in the pediatric patients.

In the present study, 40.8% of our patients were in the age range of 1 month to 2 years, and the highest frequency of DRP (47.3%) was observed in the age range of 1 month to 2 years [Table 1]. Due to several reasons, children are more likely to be at probable risk of DRP compared with adults. Developmental stages and hepatic metabolism of drugs in the 1st year of life are one of these reasons. Moore et al. investigated reports of adverse drug events in the US Food and Drug Administration for 38 months and found that about 7,000 reports from approximately 500,000 reported cases were related to infants and children under the age of 2 years.[32]

In this study, the frequency of DRP in males and females was close with a negligible superiority in male patients. However, gender is not a significant risk factor for DRPs in pediatric patients due to special physiology and nondevelopmental hormonal systems and other physiological characteristics, which are quite the same.

In our study, about one-fifth of the patients with at least one valid DRP were from PICU. Furthermore, 89.5% of patients admitted to Ped2 ward (for endocrine, cardiac, pulmonary, and gastrointestinal diseases) experienced at least one DRP, which is close to the intensive care unit of PICU (83.3%). In a study conducted by Rashed et al. on patients under the age of 18 years who were admitted to medical wards and PICU and NICU units of 7 Hong Kong hospitals, the highest frequency of DRP for a time period of 3 months (58%) was reported from medical wards (i.e., nonintensive care units). However, about 25% of patients of both PICU and NICU units experienced at least one DRP, which were higher than medical units.[33] These results are consistent with the results of our study. Complicated medical status of the patients admitted to PICU and NICU, multiorgan failure in most of these patients which necessitates vital organs functioning and consuming more drugs and potent as well as drugs with higher risks in terms of drug toxicity, drug interactions, and so on should be considered to determine the possible cause of increased DRP incidence. It seems necessary for medical staff such as physicians, pharmacists, and nurses to pay more attention to training and monitoring in terms of pharmacotherapy in patients admitted to these units.

According to the results obtained from the WHO-ICD10 classification system, the most common cause of hospitalization in this study was due to the respiratory system disease (16.8%), which can be justified by the high incidence of this type of illness in the pediatric population. Mansourian et al. conducted a study on respiratory system diseases leading to children's admissions and the level of air pollution in Isfahan as the second largest city in Iran.[34] Furthermore, the geographical location of the pediatric hospital may also affect an increase in the length of hospitalization of respiratory infections, and consequently increase in prescription and DRP occurrence.

In terms of the number of prescribed drugs in patients' orders, 52% of the studied patients had a prescriptive number of medications of 1–5, and the percentage of patients with at least one DRP was increased with the increase in the number of prescribed drugs, so that 90% of patients with the number of prescribed drugs more than 10 experienced at least one DRP. Increased potential errors of medical staff, increased risk of drug–drug interactions, and reduced patients' compliance with their medical orders are among the involved factors for the increased risk of DRPs in polypharmacy.

Keefer et al. reported a study to investigate the quality differences of medication errors reporting among physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and families and emphasized the need for training about reporting of drug errors.[35] The results of our study showed that pharmacists had played a significant role in finding and documented drug prescription problems with a report proportion of >80% of DRPs and indicate the necessity of further information and training to other health service providers including physicians and nurses.

According to the PCNE classification system in our study, the highest frequency of DRP was related to safety of treatment (43.5%), and the highest frequency in subgroups of this classification was linked to potentially dangerous adverse events (28.8%), no effect of drug treatment (22%), and untreated symptoms or indications (13.1%). In the study of Movva et al., the highest frequency of identified DRP has also related to no effect of drug treatment (20.4%).[31]

In our study, drug dose selection (34.2%) and drug-type selection (25.5%) and other causes such as monitoring (14.5%) were among the common types of cause for DRPs in children. It should be noted that in the present study, a specific reason was initially identified for each of the cases by the clinical pharmacist despite the possibility of several reasons for a DRP.

Lack of enough studies in the pediatric subpopulations, standardization of adult dosing based on the age (or body weight or any other demographic characteristics of pediatric patients) without validated evidence and lack of awareness about the impact these factors may have worsening effects on the unsafe usage of medication use in children. Furthermore, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic differences in different age subgroups as well as selecting an appropriate dosage form of a drug with the least probable side effects along with the highest possible effectiveness make the problem even more complicated. Consequently, pharmacotherapeutic monitoring of drug therapy has particular importance in the pediatric population to prevent the complications due to the differences in absorption and distribution, metabolism, and drug elimination in pediatric subpopulations. In the study of Rashed et al., the highest rate of DRPs was reported about drug selection and dosing problem.[36]

Using the ATC classification system, the most commonly utilized drugs in NICU1 and Ped3 units were systemic antimicrobial drugs and in PICU and Ped1 units were nervous system drugs. Among antimicrobial drugs, β-lactam antimicrobial drugs (except for penicillin) had a significant share. In a study conducted by Modi et al., 63% of the reported 338 medication errors in a pediatric hospital were related to the usage of β-lactam antimicrobial drugs and 6% were related to both macrolide and glycopeptide group.[37] In pediatric clinical practice in Iran, infectious diseases of children are mostly diagnosis clinically, and empirical treatment is started before pathogen identification. Paying enough attention to identifying the responsible pathogens for the illness in bacterial infections in different age groups affects drug selection and may have further impacts on drug dose selection, dose intervals, and oral or injection usage in the pharmacotherapy infections in the pediatric population.

In our study, among the nervous system drugs, analgesic and antipyretic drugs, as well as antiepileptic drugs, had the highest frequency of utilization. In children who have not started to speak, it is hard for physicians, nurses, and their parents of children to understand or estimate if the pain remains and how much is its intensity. Hence, the drug therapy for pain may be continued and make the occurrence of DRPs more probable. Epilepsy also has many complications in terms of seizure recurrence risk, patient's age, the prognosis of the disease, and existing pharmaceutical formulations, which make it difficult to prescribe and select appropriate drugs and dose for effective epileptic seizure control. Different classes of antiepileptic drugs have properties including effects on liver enzymes and various drug interactions and also special side effects such as skin rashes and visual effects, which require careful monitoring to prevent DRPs.

In our study, gastrointestinal drugs as well as drugs used in metabolic disorders had the highest percentage of DRP occurrence after systemic antimicrobial and nervous system drugs. Vitamins, including multivitamins and other essential vitamins, had a higher percentage. Hermanspann et al. reported a study on about 3,000 drug prescriptions in 1.5 years to investigate the incidence and severity of medication errors associated with parenteral nutrition in children and newborns admitted to intensive care units.[38] In a study conducted by Prot-Labarthe et al., systemic antibiotics and gastrointestinal drugs and metabolism were the most used drugs that resulted in an intervention.[39]

In our study, clinical pharmacist's intervention for DRPs was mostly performed at the prescribing level (54% out of the total 98 interventions), which also shows an acceptable level of contribution of clinical pharmacist in patient care and positive communication with attending physicians. A previously published similar report by Ganachari et al. also indicates the highest number of needed interventions in drug selection and dosing level.[40] In their study, the interventions taken at drug level had a low frequency, which indicates the necessity of providing more clinical pharmacists' privileges for proper and reasonable interventions in the pharmacotherapy of patients admitted in different units as well as the better level of cooperation of the medical staff.

We had a 59.2% rate of acceptance of the clinical pharmacist's proposed interventions by the medical staff which is more acceptable to previously published similar studies which are reported about 30%.[31],[41] Clinical reasoning skills of clinical pharmacists and also active attendance in the clinical round as we did in our study may improve these rate.

We had some limitations in our study which include the limited duration of the study, the limited number of studied wards, difficulties in patients' follow-up, and limited access to some pediatric patients due to their critical medical status. It should be noted that our study has been conducted to identify and document DRPs in children admitted to Imam Hossein Children's Hospital, and its results cannot be generalized to other hospitals.

In this study, we have learned that in Imam Hossein Children's Hospital, the most commonly documented drugs related to DRP were systemic antimicrobial drugs, nervous system drugs, and the digestive system and metabolism drugs, which their frequency was higher in the medical wards in contrast to critical care units. Furthermore, the most common cause of DRPs was related to the safety of the treatment, especially high-risk ADRs which could be prevented by active intervention. Our study confirms the necessity for the active role of clinical pharmacists before, during, and after drug therapy in hospitalized pediatric patients for the safety and proper utilization of drugs in this vulnerable population.


  Authors' Contribution Top


This research was a doctor of Pharmacy thesis project for Khatereh Jafarian, and she was involved in all aspects of drafting the research protocol, its implementation, and drafting the manuscript. Prof. Sabzghabaee proposed the idea and supervised the whole project and revised the manuscript. Dr. Memarzadeh and Dr. Allameh supervised KHJ on data gathering and its validation and revised the manuscript. Ali Saffaei and Payam Peymani analyzed the data and commented on the presentation of the results. All authors revised the manuscript and approved its final version.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the manager general of the hospital, Dr. Mostafa Amini, PharmD, for his kind support during the study. Kind help of attending physicians, medical consultants, and nurse practitioners of the hospital is also appreciated. Our special thanks to Dr. Soheil Roshanzamiri (who is now a clinical pharmacy resident) for his truthful comments on the modified PCNE's DRP data gathering form.

Financial support and sponsorship

This article is the result of a Pharm. D. thesis project for Dr. Khatereh Jafarian which was financially supported by the vice-chancellery for research and technology of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran (academic grant number #397751).

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Institute of Medicine Committee on Quality of Health Care in A; Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, editors. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2000.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Wittich CM, Burkle CM, Lanier WL. Medication errors: An overview for clinicians. Mayo Clin Proc 2014;89:1116-25.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
The Pharmaceutical Care Network of Europe. The PCNE Drug-related Problems Classification Version 8.01. Available from: https://www.pcne.org/upload/files/215_PCNE_classification_V8-01.pdf. [Last accessed on 2017 May 05].  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Iasella CJ, Johnson HJ, Dunn MA. Adverse drug reactions: Type A (Intrinsic) or type B (Idiosyncratic). Clin Liver Dis 2017;21:73-87.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Bourgeois FT, Shannon MW, Valim C, Mandl KD. Adverse drug events in the outpatient setting: An 11-year national analysis. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2010;19:901-10.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Adusumilli PK, Adepu R. Drug related problems: An over view of various classification systems. Asian J Pharm Clin Res 2014;7:7-10.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Basger BJ, Moles RJ, Chen TF. Application of drug-related problem (DRP) classification systems: A review of the literature. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2014;70:799-815.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Garattini L, Padula A. Pharmaceutical care in Italy and other European countries: Between care and commerce? Postgrad Med 2018;130:52-4.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Mikeal RL, Brown TR, Lazarus HL, Vinson MC. Quality of pharmaceutical care in hospitals. Am J Hosp Pharm 1975;32:567-74.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Dashti-Khavidaki S, Khalili H, Hamishekar H, Shahverdi S. Clinical pharmacy services in an Iranian teaching hospital: A descriptive study. Pharm World Sci 2009;31:696-700.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Foroughinia F, Tazarehie SR, Petramfar P. Detecting and managing drug-related problems in the neurology ward of a tertiary care teaching hospital in Iran: A clinical pharmacist's intervention. J Res Pharm Pract 2016;5:285-9.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
12.
Tasaka Y, Tanaka A, Yasunaga D, Asakawa T, Araki H, Tanaka M. Potential drug-related problems detected by routine pharmaceutical interventions: Safety and economic contributions made by hospital pharmacists in Japan. J Pharm Health Care Sci 2018;4:33.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Westerlund T, Marklund B. Assessment of the clinical and economic outcomes of pharmacy interventions in drug-related problems. J Clin Pharm Ther 2009;34:319-27.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Baniasadi S, Fahimi F. Adverse drug reactions in a pulmonary teaching hospital: Incidence, pattern, seriousness, and preventability. Curr Drug Saf 2011;6:230-6.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Gholami K, Shalviri G. Factors associated with preventability, predictability, and severity of adverse drug reactions. Ann Pharmacother 1999;33:236-40.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Koochak HE, Babaii A, Pourdast A, Golrokhy R, Rasoolinejad M, Khodaei S, et al. Prevalence of adverse drug reactions to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) among HIV positive patients in Imam Khomeini hospital of Tehran, Iran. Infect Disord Drug Targets 2017;17:116-9.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Kourorian Z, Fattahi F, Pourpak Z, Rasoolinejad M, Gholami K. Adverse drug reactions in an Iranian department of adult infectious diseases. East Mediterr Health J 2009;15:1351-7.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Mirbaha F, Shalviri G, Yazdizadeh B, Gholami K, Majdzadeh R. Perceived barriers to reporting adverse drug events in hospitals: A qualitative study using theoretical domains framework approach. Implement Sci 2015;10:110.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Mohebbi N, Shalviri G, Salarifar M, Salamzadeh J, Gholami K. Adverse drug reactions induced by cardiovascular drugs in cardiovascular care unit patients. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2010;19:889-94.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Mokhtari F, Nikyar Z, Naeini BA, Esfahani AA, Rahmani S. Adverse cutaneous drug reactions: Eight year assessment in hospitalized patients. J Res Med Sci 2014;19:720-5.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Pourseyed S, Fattahi F, Pourpak Z, Gholami K, Shariatpanahi SS, Moin A, et al. Adverse drug reactions in patients in an Iranian department of internal medicine. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2009;18:104-10.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Saheb Sharif-Askari F, Saheb Sharif-Askari N, Javadi M, Gholami K. Adverse drug reactions reported to the drug and poison information center of Tehran, Iran. PLoS One 2017;12:e0185450.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Vaseghi G, Abed A, Jafari E, Eslami N, Eshraghi A. Assessment of adverse drug reaction due to cancer chemotherapy in a teaching oncology hospital in Isfahan, central of Iran. Rev Recent Clin Trials 2016;11:266-72.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Choonara IA, Harris F. Adverse drug reactions in medical inpatients. Arch Dis Child 1984;59:578-80.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Impicciatore P, Choonara I, Clarkson A, Provasi D, Pandolfini C, Bonati M. Incidence of adverse drug reactions in paediatric in/out-patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2001;52:77-83.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Wong IC, Ghaleb MA, Franklin BD, Barber N. Incidence and nature of dosing errors in paediatric medications: A systematic review. Drug Saf 2004;27:661-70.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
European Medicines Agency. International Conference on Harmonisation. Topic E11. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/ich-e11r1-guideline-clinical-investigation-medicinal-products-pediatric-population-revision-1_en.pdf. [Last accessed on 2017 May 05].  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Available from: https://www.whocc.no/atc_ddd_index/WHOAaTCScAf. [Last accessed on 2017 May 05].  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Available from: http://apps.who.int/classifications/icd10/browseWHOICoDcAf. [Last accessed on 2017 May 05].  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Suchmacher M, Geller M. Practical Biostatistics A User-Friendly Approach for Evidence-Based Medicine. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2013. Available from: https://www.worldcat.org/title/practical-biostatistics-a-user-friendly-approach-for-evidence-based-medicine/oclc/871200129?referer=br&ht=edition. [Last accessed on 2018 Jun 26].  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Movva R, Jampani A, Nathani J, Pinnamaneni SH, Challa SR. A prospective study of incidence of medication-related problems in general medicine ward of a tertiary care hospital. J Adv Pharm Technol Res 2015;6:190-4.  Back to cited text no. 31
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
32.
Moore TJ, Weiss SR, Kaplan S, Blaisdell CJ. Reported adverse drug events in infants and children under 2 years of age. Pediatrics 2002;110:e53.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Rashed AN, Wilton L, Lo CC, Kwong BY, Leung S, Wong IC. Epidemiology and potential risk factors of drug-related problems in Hong Kong paediatric wards. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2014;77:873-9.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Mansourian M, Javanmard SH, Poursafa P, Kelishadi R. Air pollution and hospitalization for respiratory diseases among children in Isfahan, Iran. Ghana Med J 2010;44:138-43.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Keefer P, Kidwell K, Lengyel C, Warrier K, Wagner D. Variability in threshold for medication error reporting between physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and families. Curr Drug Saf 2017;12:187-92.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Rashed AN, Neubert A, Tomlin S, Jackman J, Alhamdan H, AlShaikh A, et al. Epidemiology and potential associated risk factors of drug-related problems in hospitalised children in the United Kingdom and Saudi Arabia. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2012;68:1657-66.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Modi A, Germain E, Soma V, Munjal I, Rinke ML. Epidemiology of and risk factors for harmful anti-infective medication errors in a pediatric hospital. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2018;44:599-604.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Hermanspann T, Schoberer M, Robel-Tillig E, Härtel C, Goelz R, Orlikowsky T, et al. Incidence and severity of prescribing errors in parenteral nutrition for pediatric inpatients at a neonatal and pediatric intensive care unit. Front Pediatr 2017;5:149.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Prot-Labarthe S, Di Paolo ER, Lavoie A, Quennery S, Bussières JF, Brion F, et al. Pediatric drug-related problems: A multicenter study in four French-speaking countries. Int J Clin Pharm 2013;35:251-9.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Ganachari MS, Mahendra Kumar BJ, Shashikala CW, Fibin M. Assessment of drug therapy intervention by clinical pharmacist in tertiary care hospital. Indian J Pharm Pract 2010;3:22-8.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Parthasarathi G, Ramesh M, Kumar JK, Madaki S. Assessment of drug related problems and clinical pharmacists' interventions in an Indian teaching hospital. J Pharm Pract Res 2003;33:272-4.  Back to cited text no. 41
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
Authors' Con...
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed224    
    Printed8    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded55    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal