Home Print this page Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size
Users Online: 153
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 135-139

Pentoxifylline in prevention of amphotericin B-induced nephrotoxicity and electrolyte abnormalities


1 Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practice, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2 Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practice; Isfahan Kidney Diseases Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
3 Department of Oncology/Hematology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Date of Submission12-Feb-2020
Date of Acceptance02-Aug-2020
Date of Web Publication08-Oct-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Saeedeh Jabalameli
Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practice, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jrpp.JRPP_20_98

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Objective: Amphotericin B is an antifungal agent used to treat serious fungal infections mainly in critically ill patients. Despite its adverse effects including renal toxicity and electrolyte imbalances, amphotericin B remains one of the best choices for antifungal treatment. Information from animal studies has provided a strong scientific basis for the use of pentoxifylline as lowering nephroprotective agent. The present study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of pentoxifylline in preventing renal toxicity and electrolytes imbalances induced by amphotericin B. Methods: This study was conducted as a randomized controlled trial on 44 patients admitted to Sayyedoshohada Hospital, Isfahan, Iran, from October 2016 to August 2018. Patients were assigned to one of the two groups: Pentoxifylline, 400 mg twice a day, or matching placebo, from the 1st day of amphotericin B therapy till minimum of 7 days. All patients' information including lab data (serum and urine levels of Mg, Na, and K, serum creatinine level, blood urea nitrogen [BUN] and urinary creatinine excretion) were gathered at the time of drug initiation and during the study period. The results were analyzed by SPSS v. 20 software and Repeated measures test was used to assess the differences between groups Findings: This study did not show any significant differences between the two groups in terms of all the assessed variables, including serum and urinary levels of electrolytes, and creatinine, as well as the number of cases presented acute kidney injury during the study period. Conclusion: Despite the positive effects of pentoxifylline in preventing renal complications in previous studies, this study could not show a definitive result in salt wasting or renal damage induced by amphotericin B. So, Designing robust studies with more included samples would be valuable.

Keywords: Amphotericin B, electrolytes imbalance, nephrotoxicity, Pentoxifylline


How to cite this article:
Panahi-Shokouh M, Moghaddas A, Badri S, Jabalameli S, Momenzadeh M, Mehrzad V, Ashrafi F. Pentoxifylline in prevention of amphotericin B-induced nephrotoxicity and electrolyte abnormalities. J Res Pharm Pract 2020;9:135-9

How to cite this URL:
Panahi-Shokouh M, Moghaddas A, Badri S, Jabalameli S, Momenzadeh M, Mehrzad V, Ashrafi F. Pentoxifylline in prevention of amphotericin B-induced nephrotoxicity and electrolyte abnormalities. J Res Pharm Pract [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 1];9:135-9. Available from: https://www.jrpp.net/text.asp?2020/9/3/135/297570




  Introduction Top


Despite more than 50 years of its clinical use and the introduction of newer antifungal agents, amphotericin B has remained as a major antifungal medication for treatment of disseminated, serious, and life-threatening mycotic infections such as Candida spp., Aspergillus spp., and the Mucorales. This is due to the broad spectrum antifungal activity as well as low rates of resistance to amphotericin B.[1],[2] Besides clinical effectiveness, amphotericin B treatment is associated with a range of acute and chronic adverse reactions.[2] Nephrotoxicity and consequent electrolyte imbalances have been demonstrated as the most clinically significant adverse reactions of amphotericin B which may restrict its clinical utility.[3] Electrolyte abnormalities including hypokalemia and hypomagnesemia also occur frequently during amphotericin B therapy in a dose-dependent pattern.[4],[5] These electrolyte abnormalities can cause serious complications such as metabolic disorders, rhabdomyolysis, and life-threatening arrhythmias.[4] Among many approaches studied so far, only saline loading and administering lipid formulations of amphotericin B (especially liposomal amphotericin B) have been clearly implicated to be clinically effective and safe in preventing or decreasing its nephrotoxicity.[6] However, these two modalities are not without disadvantages. For example, excess salt intake may exacerbate the condition of patients with pre-existing sodium or fluid overload such as congestive heart failure and cirrhosis.[7] Lipid formulations of amphotericin B are very expensive and still associated with some degrees of nephrotoxicity and electrolytes imbalances.[6]

Pentoxifylline is a non-specific phosphodiesterase inhibitor used to treat peripheral vascular diseases.[8] Pentoxifylline has several pharmacological effects, including improvement in microcirculation, decreasing blood viscosity, inhibition of platelet aggregation, endothelial-bearing vascular relaxation, immunosuppressive and antiproliferative effects.[9] Also, pentoxifylline inhibits several inflammatory cytokines including TNF-α, interleukin 1 and 6.[10] Pentoxifylline can inhibit the activity and proliferation of lymphocytes and renal fibroblasts, which play an important role in kidney fibrosis.[11] Many studies have demonstrated the positive effects of this drug in diabetic and chronic kidney diseases, chronic cerebrovascular disease and idiopathic infertility.[12],[13],[14] Some of the pharmacological mechanisms of this drug to improve acute renal failure include interfering with adenosine receptors, stimulating vasodilator prostaglandin synthesis, inhibiting vascular conjugation, inhibiting nitrate production and inflammatory factors, as well as inhibiting proteinuria and apoptosis.[15] Pentoxifylline reduces the oxidative activity of polymorphonuclear leukocytes that play a role in amphotericin B-induced nephropathy;[16] this mechanism may be considered as the logic for pentoxifylline implication in preventing amphotericin B-induced renal toxicity.

Nephrotoxicity risk can be reduced by using less doses of amphotericin B and by avoiding simultaneous treatment with other nephrotoxins.[17] The use of vasodilator drugs such as calcium channel antagonists in mice[18] and antioxidant drugs such as N-acetylcysteine in humans[19] were also prophylactic interventions to reduce amphotericin B-induced nephropathy.

Considering the pathological background of amphotericin B-induced renal toxicity, we designed a placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the nephroprotrctive effect of pentoxifylline addition to amphotericin B therapy in hospitalized patients. The objective is to answer the question of whether pentoxifylline further improves renal outcome in patients already receiving standard measurement for kidney protection.


  Methods Top


This study was designed as a prospective, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial, to evaluate the effect of pentoxifylline administration in prevention of amphotericin B-induced electrolytes imbalances and nephrotoxicity.

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (No. 195013) and was carried out from October 2016 to August 2018. This study was registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (No. IRCT2016071328901N1).

Samples were collected from patients admitted to the Sayyedoshohada Hospital, a center of Hematology and Oncology affiliated to Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. The intervention was conducted on 60 patients aged 18-65 years, who were identified to have fungal infection and were supposed to receive conventional amphotericin B for more than seven days. Patients were eligible for enrollment if their baseline creatinine clearance exceeded 60 mL/min.

Subjects entered a two-week study period during which background nephroprotective therapy to prevent amphotericin B nephropathy, which included administration of 0.9% sodium chloride fluid, was established before and left unchanged throughout the study period. Enrolled patients were randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups, using blocked randomization method: pentoxifylline, 400 mg oral tablets [Amin Pharmaceutical Company, Isfahan, Iran] twice daily or matching placebo. In either groups, pentoxifylline or placebo were added to the standard therapy for the underlying pathology. The physician, patients, the main researcher, and also the analyst were blind for the type of treatment groups. All included patients signed informed consent form.

Baseline and follow-up laboratory assessments included serum creatinine concentration and urinary creatinine excretion, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), serum and urinary levels of Na, K, and Mg, and venous blood gas (VBG). The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated by the MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) formula.[20]

In this study, NGAL (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin) was measured in blood samples by ELISA kit at days 0 and 7 from the start of treatment with amphotericin B, to identify acute renal damage due to amphotericin B administration.

Normal distribution of all extracted clinical parameters were investigated in both groups using Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Furthermore, age, baseline eGFR, total dose and duration of amphotericin B administration, and the mean values of the electrolytes administered for the studied patients during hospitalization, were compared between two groups at the study beginning using Independent Samples T-test.

Differences in the assessed parameters were compared between two study groups at the end of the study, using Repeated measures ANOVA test. Also, the occurrence of acute kidney injury (AKI), defined as a minimum of 0.3 mg/dL increase in serum creatinine within 48 hours from amphotericin B initiation,[21] was evaluated and compared between two groups, using Pearson Chi-Square test.

All analyses were conducted using SPSS for windows (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) version 16.0. A level of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


  Results Top


Sixteen of the initially screened 60 patients dropped out because of changes in treatment center and loss to follow-up or changes in treatment regimen; thus, forty four patients finally finished the study. These were randomly assigned to pentoxifylline (19 patients) or placebo (25 patients) groups. All patients were administered by conventional amphotericin B for a minimum of seven days, for various fungal infections. The two groups were similar with respect to age (P = 0.324) and baseline clinical parameters including eGFR (P = 0.305), total dose (P = 0.778) and duration (P = 0.766) of amphotericin B administration, but not baseline urine potassium excretion (P = 0.002); so there were no statistically significant baseline differences between the two groups across all analyzed variables, except urinary potassium excretion. [Table 1] shows demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics of both groups at baseline, and final (seventh day of treatment) analyses.
Table 1: Demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics of both groups at baseline, and final (seventh day of treatment) analyses

Click here to view


As shown in this table, concomitant treatment with pentoxifylline for 7 days besides amphotericin B, resulted in no significant changes in all the assessed variables compared to the placebo group. Nevertheless, according to the Pearson Chi-Square test, the number of AKI occurrence was not significantly different in either groups (2 cases in the pentoxifylline, and 3 cases in the placebo group). The baseline urine potassium excretion was different between groups, however, as demonstrated by ANCOVA sub-analysis, this baseline difference had no effect on the final assessment of this parameter in the two study groups.

The pentoxifylline therapy was well tolerated in this study.


  Discussion Top


This study was the first placebo-controlled clinical trial to investigate the effects of adding pentoxifylline to the therapeutic regimen of patients receiving amphotericin B, to prevent its major side effects, namely electrolyte disturbances and nephrotoxicity.

Recent studies on the renoprotective effects of pentoxifylline is steadily increasing.[22],[23],[24]

In two animal studies, pentoxifylline could show beneficial results in reducing renal damage induced by amphotericin B administration.[25],[26]

One study conducted on 11 patients with lupus nephritis, showed a decrease in proteinuria concentrations after use of pentoxifylline in all patients.[27] Also, proteinuria reduction has been demonstrated in the other study by administering pentoxifylline (800-1200 mg daily) for six month in patients with membranous glomerulonephritis.[28]

In one study on five patients receiving bone marrow transplantation, the positive effect of administering 1200 mg/day pentoxifylline for at least 2 weeks was shown in the treatment of secondary nephrotoxicity induced by amphotericin B and cyclosporine compared to the control group.[29]

In this placebo-controlled study, the preventive effects of electrolyte disturbances derived from pentoxifylline therapy were evaluated in patients with malignancy or reduced immune status who were treated with conventional amphotericin B for various fungal infections. Although the study attempted to address the limitations of previous studies, including the lack of placebo arm, and the differences in administered pentoxifylline dose, however, the addition of pentoxifylline (800 mg/day) did not show any significant changes in the studied variables compared to the control group, in the present study. Notably it should be considered that the small number of included patients may be a key point for observing the non-significant results of pentoxifylline administration compared to the control group.


  Authors' Contribution Top


Azadeh Moghaddas and Shirinsadat Badri conceptualized the research protocol and interpreted data. Valiollah Mehrzad and Farzaneh Ashrafi helped in patients' recruitment and assisted in manuscript editing. Mahsa Panahi-Shokouh, Saeedeh Jabalameli, and Mahnaz Momenzadeh helped in data collection and analysis, and manuscript writing. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript for publication.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Fanos V, Cataldi L. Amphotericin B-induced nephrotoxicity: A review. J Chemother 2000;12:463-70.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Laniado-Laborín R, Cabrales-Vargas MN. Amphotericin B: Side effects and toxicity. Rev Iberoam Micol 2009;26:223-7.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Ulozas E. Amphotericin B-induced nephrotoxicity. Compr Toxicol 2010;7:347-57.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Gallis HA, Drew RH, Pickard WW. Amphotericin B: 30 years of clinical experience. Rev Infect Dis 1990;12:308-29.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Harbarth S, Pestotnik SL, Lloyd JF, Burke JP, Samore MH. The epidemiology of nephrotoxicity associated with conventional amphotericin B therapy. Am J Med 2001;111:528-34.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Karimzadeh I, Khalili H, Farsaei S, Dashti-Khavidaki S, Sagheb MM. Role of diuretics and lipid formulations in the prevention of amphotericin B-induced nephrotoxicity. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2013;69:1351-68.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Karimzadeh I, Farsaei S, Khalili H, Dashti-Khavidaki S. Are salt loading and prolonging infusion period effective in prevention of amphotericin B-induced nephrotoxicity? Expert Opin Drug Saf 2012;11:969-83.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Samlaska CP, Winfield EA. Pentoxifylline. J Am Acad Dermatol 1994;30:603-21.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Kreth S, Ledderose C, Luchting B, Weis F, Thiel M. Immunomodulatory properties of pentoxifylline are mediated via adenosine-dependent pathways. Shock 2010;34:10-6.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Heystek HC, Thierry AC, Soulard P, Moulon C. Phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors reduce human dendritic cell inflammatory cytokine production and Th1-polarizing capacity. Int Immunol 2003;15:827-35.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Nasiri-Toosi Z, Dashti-Khavidaki S, Khalili H, Lessan-Pezeshki M. A review of the potential protective effects of pentoxifylline against drug-induced nephrotoxicity. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2013;69:1057-73.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Rao KM, Currie MS, McCachren SS, Cohen HJ. Pentoxifylline and other methyl xanthines inhibit interleukin-2 receptor expression in human lymphocytes. Cell Immunol 1991;135:314-25.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Rieckmann P, Weber F, Günther A, Martin S, Bitsch A, Broocks A, et al. Pentoxifylline, a phosphodiesterase inhibitor, induces immune deviation in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol 1996;64:193-200.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Strutz F, Heeg M, Kochsiek T, Siemers G, Zeisberg M, Müller GA. Effects of pentoxifylline, pentifylline and gamma-interferon on proliferation, differentiation, and matrix synthesis of human renal fibroblasts. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2000;15:1535-46.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Berens KL, Luke DR. Pentoxifylline in the isolated perfused rat kidney. Transplantation 1990;49:876-9.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Sullivan GW, Carper HT, Mandell GL. Pentoxifylline modulates activation of human neutrophils by amphotericin B in vitro. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1992;36:408-16.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Bates DW, Su L, Yu DT, Chertow GM, Seger DL, Gomes DR, et al. Correlates of acute renal failure in patients receiving parenteral amphotericin B. Kidney Int 2001;60:1452-9.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Tolins JP, Raij L. Chronic amphotericin B nephrotoxicity in the rat: Protective effect of calcium channel blockade. J Am Soc Nephrol 1991;2:98-102.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Karimzadeh I, Khalili H, Dashti-Khavidaki S, Sharifian R, Abdollahi A, Hasibi M, et al. N-acetyl cysteine in prevention of amphotericin-induced electrolytes imbalances: A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, clinical trial. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2014;70:399-408.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: A new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med 1999;130(6):461-70.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Acute Kidney Injury Work Group. KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for Acute Kidney Injury. Kidney Int Suppl 2012;2:1.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Lin SL, Chen YM, Chiang WC, Tsai TJ, Chen WY. Pentoxifylline: A potential therapy for chronic kidney disease. Nephrology (Carlton) 2004;9(4):198-204.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Lin SL, Chiang WC, Chen YM, Lai CF, Tsai TJ, Hsieh BS. The renoprotective potential of pentoxifylline in chronic kidney disease. J Chin Med Assoc 2005;68(3):99-105.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Chen YM, Lin SL, Chiang WC, Wu KD, Tsai TJ. Pentoxifylline ameliorates proteinuria through suppression of renal monocyte chemo-attractant protein-1 in patients with proteinuric primary glomerular diseases. Kidney Int 2006;69(8):1410-5.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Luke DR, Wasan KM, McQueen TJ, Lopez-Berestein G. Enhancement of the treatment of experimental candidiasis with vascular decongestants. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1990;162(1):211-4.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Wasan K, Vadiei K, Lopez-Berestein G, Verani R, Luke D. Pentoxifylline in amphotericin B toxicity rat model. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy 1990;34(2):241-4.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Galindo-Rodríguez G, Bustamante R, Esquivel-Nava G, Salazar-Exaire D, Vela-Ojeda J, Vadillo-Buenfil M, et al. Pentoxifylline in the treatment of refractory nephrotic syndrome secondary to lupus nephritis. J Rheumatol 2003;30:2382-4.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Badri S, Dashti-Khavidaki S, Ahmadi F, Mahdavi-Mazdeh M, Abbasi MR, Khalili H. Effect of add-on pentoxifylline on proteinuria in membranous glomerulonephritis: A 6-month placebo-controlled trial. Clin Drug Investig 2013;33:215-22.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Mayer J, Doubek M, Doubek J, Horký D, Scheer P, Stepánek M. Reduced nephrotoxicity of conventional amphotericin B therapy after minimal nephroprotective measures: Animal experiments and clinical study. J Infect Dis 2002;186:379-88.  Back to cited text no. 29
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
Authors' Con...
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed349    
    Printed11    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded66    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal